Make separate category for 3rd pair and PPs under second pair

The filters in study mode automatically lump together 3rd pair and PPs under second pair (e.g., on AK7, QQ and 87s end up in the same bucket), but the behavior of these two hand classes are almost always in utter contrast to one another. Separating them in the filter tab (and every where else hand classes show up) would be most helpful.

I see this has been marked as “completed,” but there are scenarios where PPs and pairs on the board are still in the same filter class. E.g., on AQ47, 66 and 84s are both “low pair”. Can we fix this as well?

Ah, I see what you mean. We have Top, Second, Third, and Low pair right now. You’d also like something between second and third for pocket pairs.

Ideally, something to distinguish PPs in general from pairs made with a card on the board. It happens for “underpairs”, but not for other PPs.

I’m almost certain I know the answer to this already, but is there any progress on this?

Hi, just adding another vote for this. This is still a pretty important limitation for study mode because pocket pairs and actual board-pair hands often have very different strategies, so combining them makes the aggregate frequencies much less useful.

For example, on AK5, “third pair” mixes 5x with QQ–66, which makes it impossible to quickly see the true betting frequency of 5x without manually backing out the pocket pairs.

Since this has been marked “In Progress” for quite a while, is there any update on whether separating pocket pairs from board-pair hands is still planned? I think this would materially improve range analysis and make the filters much more useful.